
Original airdate: November 21, 2021
The premise: Homer plays matchmaker with a despondent Smithers, pairing him up with fashion mogul and reality TV judge Michael DeGraff. It seems like the perfect relationship, until Smithers discovers Michael’s new factory in Springfield might be a more toxic presence than even the nuclear plant.
The reaction: Season 27’s “The Burns Cage” finally pushed Smithers out of the closet, abandoning his go-nowhere crush on Mr. Burns to find happiness elsewhere (at least for twenty-two minutes), in an absolutely wasted opportunity of an episode. Nowhere in the episode was any real examination of Smithers as a character, or of what he really wants out of life or out of a partner. The issue is if that if you’re going to treat Smithers’ sexuality seriously, you need to explore what about Mr. Burns he’s attracted to, and what similar traits he could be attracted to in other people. Instead, the episode temporarily pairs him with the flamboyant party boy Julio, because that’s the only other gay character on the show. This episode feels like a rectification of “Cage,” and while it didn’t dig as much into Smithers as I’d hoped, it definitely felt like an earnest attempt. Perhaps credit can go to co-writer Johnny LaZebnik, who penned this episode with his father, long-time Simpsons writer Rob LaZebnik. This felt like a genuine attempt to write Smithers as an actual character in a real relationship, clearly an intended mission by Johnny, who is gay himself (and funny too, if his Twitter is any indication. His snarky promotional posts about this episode actually made me laugh out loud). So we start with Smithers at a particularly low point, which Homer tries to rectify in setting him up with another rich capitalist, the affable Michael DeGraff, played by Victor Garber. A jet-setting man of high fashion and expensive tastes, he responds very well to Smithers’ simplistic wants and desires, happy to be with someone who isn’t trying to leech off of his fame and influence. Their relationship progresses fast, and eventually Michael sets down roots in Springfield, opening up a clothing factory in town so he can be closer to his new love. In all the Michael-Smithers scenes, it felt like Michael had the bulk of the dialogue, which makes sense since he’s the guest star. I also think it’s appropriate that he’s the more talkative and dominant of the relationship, since we have over thirty years of evidence that Smithers is most definitely a sub. However, like I said before, I do wish we heard more from Smithers in this episode and why he really connected with Michael. It isn’t until the ending when a lot of stuff gets rushed by that really could have been explored. When Smithers discovers that Michael’s factory is horribly damaging the environment, he confronts him about it, but Michael brushes him off with some sound logic (“I can’t believe I fell in love with a monster!” “Really? Seems to me you have a pretty consistent type.”) Yeah, Michael is his new Mr. Burns, but that reveal once again reopens the burning question about Smithers’ morality. He’s been in love with Burns for decades now, and while it seems he doesn’t approve of all of Burns’ evil inclinations, he definitely was more than willing to actively look the other way regarding all of the horrible shit he’s done. So what does that say about Smithers? Does he realize that himself? Does he just embrace that he’s willing to turn a blind eye to evil for his own happiness? Or does he rebuke it and decide to turn his life around? Well, he was about to go with option A, in another moment I wish had more time to breathe (he gives a toast, “To seeing the best in each other, and ignoring everything else!”) But then Michael is mean to the puppy that he adopted from Burns, and that’s the last straw for Smithers, and he ends the relationship. So, yeah, I was hoping for more, but this episode was actually fairly solid throughout. It felt like one or two baby steps made from “Road to Cincinnati,” a similarly admirable, if still underwhelming attempt to craft a story solely on our supporting cast. But while that episode culminated in a painfully cliche and completely unearned schmaltzy conclusion, this one wraps things up too quickly in a semi-predictable way, but it all still felt like a complete story that progressed nicely, so that is a definite step up to me. I even laughed out loud to myself at one point, which I generally don’t do with anything I watch alone, so that by itself make this episode stand out. This is easily the best executed episode of the season. Honestly, the first two acts were the best I’ve seen from this show in a while. I’ve always harped about wanting to see more episodes featuring secondary characters, and I’m hoping this is a sign of better things to come.
Three items of note:
– Really fun guest couch gag of the family being created from potato stamps. The credits read two Swedish names as the creators, which I looked up to find one of them on YouTube. Apparently they created a video with millions of hits that recreated Homer’s binge-eating through New Orleans from season 29’s “Lisa Gets the Blues,” which presumably got them on the show’s radar, and eventually got them to do this. There have only been two couch gags in the past eight episodes this season, the other being that pretty boring Crossing Swords cross-promotion, but can all future couch gags just be made by fans? It’s less work for the staff to do, and all the fan-made segments so far have been so incredibly creative and original, many times more stand-out than the episode they’re attached to.
– I was kind of confused by the bit where Burns can’t fathom that Smithers is gay, but I was misremembering the events of “The Burns Cage.” Smithers almost confessed his love to Burns at the beginning, and then by the end, they did some bullshit talking around it where Burns gives him a good performance review and they’re buddies again. A moment where Burns actually gives Smithers some tough but honest advice about his life would have been refreshing, but Burns is in full-on senile mode this episode, being stymied by a child’s puzzle for most of the runtime. Instead, he full-on encourages Smithers’ relationship, acknowledging Michael is an even more ruthless capitalist than he. It definitely works within his character, but it didn’t quite hit its mark for me. Also, I know I pledged to stop commenting on the voice actors, but this is the most dialogue Burns has had in a while, and there were big stretches of it where he sounded incredibly weak. He had at least two starring episodes last season, and I don’t remember him sounding like this. Weirdly, Smithers, also voiced by Harry Shearer, seemed fine to me. At age 77, Shearer is the oldest in the main cast, with Julie Kavner at 71 as second oldest. I really don’t mean to sound unfairly critical, but even knowing this, it still creates a bit of dissonance as a viewer when I’m watching an un-aging cartoon character have a noticeably older and hoarser voice, versus a live action series where your brain can more easily accept an older performance out of a visibly older actor.
– It’s been a long time since I could list off multiple things in an episode I thought were amusing: Homer training the hound puppies (having got a puppy last fall, I definitely related to Smithers’ line about even sharper baby teeth), the reveal of Disco Stu’s bi-curiosity (“Disco Stu is hetero-flexible!”), and even Michael got in a few good lines, including the one bit I actually laughed at. At a get together in the Simpson backyard, everyone is pleading with Michael to critique their wardrobe like he does on his TV show “America’s Got Fabric.” Lenny insistently asks him if he likes his top. Noticing Carl standing behind him, Michael responds, “Yes, he seems very nice.” I was definitely caught off-guard by this kind of gag, feeling like a more authentic flavor of the Lenny-and-Carl-are-gay joke, perhaps assisted by actually being written by a gay man. Johnny’s live-tweeting of the episode was also pretty fun to read. He seems like a real funny kid. I’m certainly interested in whatever his next script is after this.
Huh, okay, I guess the show is at least trying a little bit. Frankly, it still feels like walking on eggshells just waiting to see if the quality will cave in somehow, but they’re at least trying. Who the hell knows if it sticks or how long it does, but this definitely seems at least tolerable after the almost decade-and-a-half of sludge we’ve been through.
Sounds like a fine episode but… Really? He was in “love” with Mr Burns.
The same guy who blocked the sun, humilliates Lisa for their newspaper, wanted to send a baby to jail, owns a Nuclear plant , one of the most dangerous energy ever and pollutes everything on earth and a completely insensitive human being and being perfectly to be at his service. But the other guy just scolds a dog and that’s wayyyy too much to handle for him?
They really love to press the reset buttons so we all pretend nothing really happened
Maybe I’m reading too much into this, but Smithers was okay with everything wrong he had done, but only was upset at him kicking the puppy because as we saw at the beginning of the episode the puppy represented Smithers and was how he got into the relationship with Michael. Kicking the dog was like showing how if he had to he’d eventually kick Smithers to the side as well. IDK just how I thought of it.
That actually makes perfect sense to me. If that was the intentional meaning, it almost felt too subdued, especially given this show’s penchant for over-explaining everything (evidenced in the following scene where Smithers describes the puppy with the exact same words he used earlier describing what he wants out of a partner).
Yeah, that really is the difficulty in trying to make Smithers a real character. He kind of has to be a bit of a monster himself to play a party to all the horrible shit Burns has done and not done a thing to stop them. They did their best to ride that line in this episode, but I don’t know how far they could have pushed it before they risked breaking the status quo.
Thought this episode was fine. I definitely love this Season’s experimentation and how slowly the quality seems to be increasing. I agree with what you said about Burn’s voice. It definitely felt a little odd and reminded me of his voice in Manger Things.
DAY 8
Feeling like I just encountered an oasis or something
Holy crap, a GOOD episode? Granted, it’s not a masterpiece but the last “Good” episode of Zombie Simpsons was… the Thanksgiving episode from two years ago. I must admit, Zombie Simpsons in recent years has actually not done a bad job with LGBTQ+ material (Which is astounding considering “Three Gays of the Condo” and “There’s Something About Marrying” are two of the worst episodes of the pre-HD era). “Werking Mom” was not garbage and “Marge the Lumberjill” is at least one of the lesser evils of Season 31. Plus, Mr. Largo’s relationship with his partner is actually rather endearing. But maybe it’s as Mike said, perhaps the writing actually felt more genuine considering the writer is actually gay. Maybe the episode could’ve had more but for what we’ve got, I’ll take what I can get at this point. I can definitely see the intent of the Michael character was to be a foil to Mr. Burns and you know what? I think they actually did a pretty good job mirroring the two. And whoa, they actually put the Simpson family aside for once in favor of one of our many favorite supporting players! I think the reason why this episode ended up being a miracle like I hoped is because of the exact reason I predicted: This was the first episode of the first production season to be done under Disney, not FOX. Because it’s under a new company, the writers are able to work under different people and give off a different tone and vibe and considering what we’ve seen from tonight’s surprise, it seems to be working! This episode seems to have a completely different tone than the bland nothingness that was the first five episodes because those episodes were under FOX. Between this and a two-parter that actually wasn’t horrible, maybe Season 33 will be home to a season full of unexpected bursts of ingenuity and good humor. Dare I say it, maybe a heart and a soul are suddenly forming into this 20-year-old corpse of a show and if we keep up this rate, maybe Season 33 won’t even be Zombie Simpsons, maybe it will be the start of the “Reborn Simpsons” era! Yeah, it’s wishful thinking. Next episode’s gonna be another goddamn flashback episode about Mona, but maybe it will actually be good since it’s being done under Disney! C’mon, “Mothers and Other Strangers,” don’t make me lose my newfound faith in television!
I don’t attribute any of this to Disney. From the very beginning, this show has been shielded from almost all executive interference, so I sincerely doubt there’s any real creative difference between Fox owning it or Disney owning it. I think early on during the Fox acquisition, Al Jean basically confirmed this when he said that Disney suits told him they were going to be pretty hands off with the show and to just keep up the “good work” and that makes the most sense to me.
A valid argument. Perhaps I’m just happy I finally got my wish of an actually alright episode. I’m still trying my best to be optimistic but I guess I shouldn’t be surprised if it ends up being a fluke. Even so, this season is miles better than the last two.
I’ll be honest — haven’t watched the episode yet but it’s so fascinating when you link Johnny’s twitter because I guarantee everything he tweets (especially that promo) will be 10x funnier to me than anything in this episode. You’ve mentioned it before but it really makes you wonder what happens in the writing room that just nullifies all the individuality from these writers. Doubly interesting now as it seems like there’s a lot of younger writers on staff that would likely relish in that sort of ironic semi-shitposty sort of humor. I would really love to see an episode that embraces that sort of style lol
I read the promotional tweets…the one about Maggie dying cracked me up.
It was a pretty solid episode by zombie Simpsons standards, and I even smiled a bit at the end. But that said, following this show up with the amazing Great North and their authentic portrayals of Crispin and Ham as characters who have more defining traits than just “The Gay Couple”, it shows a lesser effort on the Simpsons writers yet again.